Bloomberg Professional Services
- Higher yields, tax policy uncertainty for state and local municipalities, and ongoing market modernization are redefining how investors approach munis.
- Leading municipal bond market participants are examining the opportunities created by a steep municipal yield curve, the consequences of evolving tax policies, and the growing importance of electronic trading, data quality, and pricing transparency.
- As issuance remains elevated and market structure continues to evolve, investors are increasingly focused on balancing after-tax income opportunities with duration risk, liquidity management, and execution efficiency.
After years of shifting rate expectations, renewed income demand and rapid market modernization, municipal bonds are receiving fresh attention from investors. But the market they are returning to looks different than the one they left.
PRODUCT MENTIONS
This article looks at the forces driving renewed interest in municipal bonds, the risks investors are watching and the data and pricing capabilities becoming increasingly important as the market evolves. Insights are based on discussions with municipal bond market professionals at Bloomberg’s Pricing Forum, held in New York in May.
Municipal investing transformed by higher yields, structural change and technology
Rising yields and the prospect of higher state taxes are drawing investors back to municipal bonds for attractive after-tax income. This resurgence is clear, with municipal mutual funds and ETFs capturing $25 billion in inflows so far this year.
However, investors are returning to a transformed landscape. In this opaque, heavily fragmented market, having a market-reflective reference point is critical. By anchoring core analytics directly to Muni BVAL, independent, market-reflective evaluations are delivered for even the most thinly traded securities. This high-quality data serves as the vital backbone keeping analytics representative of available market data.
The US municipal bond market represents approximately $4.5 trillion in outstanding debt, according to Bloomberg Intelligence, and is entering a period of higher issuance, evolving valuations and rising financing costs. While state credit profiles remain solid overall, fiscal pressures at the local level are elevating issuer-specific fundamentals as a key driver of investment decisions.
That appetite has held even against a record supply backdrop. With municipal issuance forecast to approach $600 billion this year, the market has absorbed the volume without disruption, driven largely by retail investors, separately managed accounts and ETFs drawn to the after-tax income opportunity.
Why are muni investors focused on the steep AAA yield curve?
For investors returning to municipals, higher yields have made after-tax income more attractive, but the market has also become more complex. Today’s municipal market is increasingly volatile, shaped by fragmented liquidity, electronic trading, and rising demand for accurate, timely pricing information. Complicating matters further is an unusually steep yield curve.
The AAA municipal curve, a benchmark measure of yields on the highest-quality municipal bonds, has risen sharply at intermediate and longer maturities even as the Treasury curve has stayed relatively flat. That steepness means investors are being offered significantly greater compensation for extending maturities, which creates opportunity for higher income but also greater exposure to interest-rate and duration risk.
For portfolio managers, that steepness presents tangible opportunities at the 15- to 20-year end of the curve. Steve McFee, Senior Portfolio Manager at Vanguard, believes that the 17- to 22-year maturity range is “one of the greatest carry-and-roll opportunities in decades on the market.”
But those opportunities have also come with risks. Persistent upward pressures from inflation, geopolitical instability, and uncertainty about Federal Reserve policy remain key drivers of interest-rate volatility. Rather than relying on rate risk assessment, McFee relies on robust scenario analysis and on ensuring fidelity with portfolio mandates.
It’s an approach that reflects how the broader market is adapting. Investors are increasingly shifting to ultra-short, intermediate, and long-duration strategies as macro conditions diverge. The result is a municipal market where cash flow can shift quickly, and liquidity can tighten when stress takes hold.
What tax policy uncertainty means for municipal bond demand
Tax policies at the state and local levels are another important driver of municipal bond demand. Dan Kelly, Head of Municipal Underwriting and Sales at Huntington Securities, points to rising interest in state-level millionaire taxes and the potential for changes in overall tax policies after the 2026 midterm elections. “I think there’s just a lot going on, but any sort of increase in taxes will make that asset class [Munis] more valuable,” says Kelly and adds that, given the current absolute level of yields, that dynamic is especially relevant, in spite of all the other items on people’s minds.
Now, municipal bonds offer investors not only high nominal yields but also sizable tax benefits, providing a steadier base of demand amid geopolitical tensions and macroeconomic volatility.
However, investors must pay close attention to political and policy uncertainty, as it could pose additional market risk. Changes in state and local representation in the upcoming 2026 elections, fiscal priorities, and inflation expectations can all affect Muni valuations in the months ahead.
Still, for most market participants, duration risk stays the dominant focus. Inflation and oil price volatility, along with uncertainty about future Fed leadership, continue to influence investor positioning across fixed-income markets.
How pricing data is changing muni trading decisions
Beyond these macroeconomic considerations, fixed-income traders and portfolio managers are increasingly focused on modernizing municipal trading infrastructure. Traditionally, electronic trading adoption in the municipal market has lagged that of other fixed-income sectors, but that is changing quickly.
“Algorithmic pricing is democratizing execution, but the technology costs required to build out automated quoting models are steep,” notes Kate Le Compte, Head of Muni BVAL Pricing and Curves. Driven by robust SMA demand, the market is moving away from traditional voice-based trading toward automated, electronic workflows. Consequently, the infrastructure supporting digital multi-dealer trading is being rebuilt in real time to accommodate this increasing prevalence.
That shift is also changing how liquidity is acquired and managed. Large block trades no longer dominate execution, with volume now concentrated in smaller trade sizes, particularly in the sub-$3 million range favored by SMAs, ETFs, and regional participants. For buy-side firms, the challenge is balancing speed, efficiency and execution quality as municipal trading becomes more electronic and liquidity remains fragmented.
Technology investment sits at the center of that challenge. For firms in the municipal market, key considerations include:
- Cost: The expense of building proprietary trading and pricing systems
- Vendor risk: The operational and integration risks of relying on third-party vendors
- Workflow efficiency: The need to streamline workflows and reduce manual processes
- Real-time data: The ability to act on real-time market information more effectively
Amay Poria, Head of Muni Electronic Trading at Wells Fargo, challenges the assumption that more data leads to better results. Firms are calibrating their pricing models against a range of inputs, including, but not limited to, MSRB (Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board) trading data, third-party pricing sources, and feedback from institutional trading desks. The ability to distinguish meaningful signals from noise has become a genuine competitive advantage in a market that remains crowded, and often illiquid.
How can Bloomberg help?
As market complexity continues to grow, access to independent, transparent and defensible pricing has become increasingly important. To help market participants keep up with this demanding environment, Bloomberg’s evaluated pricing solutions (BVAL) for fixed income provide more data, more often, with more transparency.
BVAL supplies independent and transparent evaluated pricing daily for over 2.7 million securities for all asset classes across the liquidity spectrum, including thinly-traded and hard-to-price fixed income securities. For the municipal market, BVAL offers AAA Municipal Curves that use real-time trades and market data sources to reflect movement in the municipal market as it happens.
Learn more about how BVAL can support fixed income pricing and valuation workflows here
Insights in this article are based on panels and fireside discussions at the Pricing Forum event held in New York in May 2026.
The data included in these materials are for illustrative purposes only. The BLOOMBERG TERMINAL service and Bloomberg data products (the “Services”) are owned and distributed by Bloomberg Finance L.P. (“BFLP”) except (i) in Argentina, Australia and certain jurisdictions in the Pacific Islands, Bermuda, China, India, Japan, Korea and New Zealand, where Bloomberg L.P. and its subsidiaries (“BLP”) distribute these products, and (ii) in Singapore and the jurisdictions serviced by Bloomberg’s Singapore office, where a subsidiary of BFLP distributes these products. BLP provides BFLP and its subsidiaries with global marketing and operational support and service. Certain features, functions, products and services are available only to sophisticated investors and only where permitted. BFLP, BLP and their affiliates do not guarantee the accuracy of prices or other information in the Services. Nothing in the Services shall constitute or be construed as an offering of financial instruments by BFLP, BLP or their affiliates, or as investment advice or recommendations by BFLP, BLP or their affiliates of an investment strategy or whether or not to “buy”, “sell” or “hold” an investment. Information available via the Services should not be considered as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. The following are trademarks and service marks of BFLP, a Delaware limited partnership, or its subsidiaries: BLOOMBERG, BLOOMBERG ANYWHERE, BLOOMBERG MARKETS, BLOOMBERG NEWS, BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL, BLOOMBERG TERMINAL and BLOOMBERG.COM. Absence of any trademark or service mark from this list does not waive Bloomberg’s intellectual property rights in that name, mark or logo. All rights reserved. © 2026 Bloomberg.
BVAL, IBVAL and BVAL Derivatives (collectively, “BVAL”) are services provided by Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (“Bloomberg”). BVAL valuations do not express an opinion on the future or projected value of any instrument and are not investment recommendations (i.e., recommendations as to whether or not to “buy,” “sell,” “hold,” or to enter or not to enter into any other transaction involving any specific interest), a recommendation as to an investment or other strategy, or commodity trading advice. No aspect of the BVAL valuation or other data is based on the consideration of a customer’s individual circumstances and information available via BVAL should not be considered as information sufficient upon which to base an investment decision. Customers should determine on their own whether they agree with BVAL valuations. BVAL may not be available in certain jurisdictions. BVAL is not recognized or licensed as an official pricing provider in any jurisdiction, and should not be relied upon to comply with any laws or regulations that prescribe the use of prices issued by authorized pricing providers. BVAL should not be construed as tax, accounting, legal or regulatory advice or opinions, or sufficient to satisfy any tax, accounting, legal or regulatory requirements. Customers are solely responsible for the selection and use of appropriate parameters, inputs, models, formulas and data for meeting their tax, accounting, legal or regulatory requirements. Bloomberg believes that the information it uses in providing the BVAL services comes from reliable sources, but does not guarantee BVAL’s accuracy. Employees involved in the BVAL services may hold positions in the securities included in the BVAL services.
BVAL valuations may include indices, rates or other values (collectively, “Values”) that could be considered ‘benchmarks’ under the EU and/or UK benchmark regulation and/or similar regulation (collectively, “BMR”) if used in a regulated manner. Customers may not use Values in any manner that could be construed as regulated ‘use’ as a benchmark under the BMR (including to determine the value of financial instruments, to measure the performance of an investment fund for the purpose of tracking the return of such Value, to define the asset allocation of a portfolio, or to compute performance fees) unless such Values are administered by an authorized or registered administrator of such Values under the BMR. Among Bloomberg and its affiliates, only Bloomberg Index Services Limited (BISL) is an authorized or registered administrator of such Values under the BMR. BISL and Additional Data providers of such Values may require direct licensing with customers depending on customers’ use.